Access to government algorithms in Poland

By Thomas Vink, 1st June 2021

The Ministry of Justice in Poland is using a computer system to randomly allocate cases to judges. Some judges claim that since the system was deployed, they have been given disproportionately more cases than others. The impartiality and independence of the judiciary in Poland has been under attack in recent years. Moje Państwo are concerned that the system is biased and could further influence how cases are decided. Details about the system’s algorithm are being kept secret and a court in Poland ruled that it does not have to be disclosed under freedom of information law.

Access to government algorithms in Poland

Organisation Name

Moje Państwo Foundation

Country/Jurisdiction

Poland

Amount Granted

EUR 2,889

Current Status

Case won

Grant type

Single Instance Litigation Support

Description

The Ministry of Justice in Poland is using a computer system to randomly allocate cases to judges. Some judges claim that since the system was deployed, they have been given disproportionately more cases than others. The impartiality and independence of the judiciary in Poland has been under attack in recent years. ePanstwo are concerned that the system is biased and could further influence how cases are decided. Details about the system’s algorithm are being kept secret and a court in Poland ruled that it does not have to be disclosed under freedom of information law.

Moje Państwo appealed the decision, aiming to get access to the content of the algorithm. More broadly, they want to set an example showing that information about the use of algorithms by public bodies should be accessible to the public.

In December 2020, Article 19 submitted an amicus curiae to the Supreme Administrative Court to support ePaństwo’s case.

In July 2021, the Poland Supreme Court presented their ruling that the Minister of Justice must provide access to the details of the algorithm. The courts also explicitly stated that the algorithm is public information.

"Some judges claim that since the system was deployed, they have been given disproportionately more cases than others"

Strategic Goal

To set a precedent that algorithms used by public bodies are subject to freedom of information laws, providing greater transparency and accountability to ensure they comply with human rights standards.

Organisation Name

Women’s Link Worldwide

Image credit: Sora Shimazaki from Pexels