Consultations: Decolonising the Digital Rights Field in Europe programme

Decolonising the Digital Rights Field in Europe Programme Consulting on our first Draft

We want to hear from you

Digital Freedom Fund (DFF) and European Digital  Rights (EDRi) are looking for your insight on decolonising the digital rights field in Europe.

This draft outline is one of the many outcomes of a two-year process of collective design with from racial and social justice and digital rights organisations, hoping to address power dynamics in the field and imagine a vision for anti-colonial digital futures.

The outline is a draft summarising plans for the decolonising programme that we hope to develop. It is not perfect nor complete. It’s open to changes and new additions. This outline will undergo a series of consultations with communities, individuals, collectives, and organisations who were not part of the original process. We hope to critique, build, and develop on these ideas, hopefully getting closer to an ambitious, disruptive, imaginative agenda of decolonisation. We also recognise that, as decolonising is a process, the ‘final’ agenda will also be a roadmap meant to be piloted and iterated, possibly revisited after a certain period of implementation.

To make the programme as accessible as possible, we have provided it in a range of formats in the link above.

  • The full text of the programme is also accessible here in Arabic (pdf and odt),  French (pdf and odt), Portuguese (pdf and odt), Romani (pdf and odt), Serbian (pdf and odt) and Spanish (pdf and odt).
  • The programme is also available in audio format here in English.

We are now looking for feedback from a wider community on how to dismantle power structures in the digital rights field.

In addition to conversations with people working toward transformative change in many fields, we are holding an open consultation for anyone who would like to input.

About the Decolonising Digital Rights Field in Europe

 

Decolonising the Digital Rights Field in Europe is a design process to build a decolonising programme for the digital rights field in Europe. 30 participants from the digital rights field and social, economic and racial justice groups are co-designing a programme to address power dynamics in the field and imagine a vision for an anti-colonial digital future.

Find the full summary of the process on DFF and EDRi websites.

Our goal with the decolonising process

 

Our goal is to initiate a process that challenges the structural causes of oppression such as racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, imperialism, and class inequality to work towards a digital rights field that centers rights and justice for all.

One outcome of this process is to put forward a programme – an ecosystem of initiatives, activities, elements – an agenda, for how to shift power and decolonise the digital rights field in Europe. In the programme, we present some concrete ideas of how to initiate structural change in the digital rights field.

This is the outline draft of that programme: our very first draft and attempt to put to paper the decolonising programme we have collectively designed.

 

The decolonising process so far

 

  • In 2020, the Digital Freedom Fund (DFF) and European Digital Rights (EDRi) kicked off the Decolonising Digital Rights Field in Europe Process. Initiated by DFF’s founder and former director Nani Jansen Reventlow, the process sought to address the power structures within the European digital rights space, structures impacting field composition, how resources are allocated, how agendas are set, and crucially, why the people most directly impacted by data-driven harms are excluded from the space.
  • From June 2021 until December 2022, 30 participants from racial, social, economic justice organisations and digital rights organisations all over Europe and beyond – as well as researchers – worked together to design a programme towards decolonising the digital rights field in Europe. From funding and organisational structures, programmatic development to partnerships frameworks and how public engagement is done, the process working groups worked to identifying what the ideal situation would be, what needs to change, and how to change it. The “how to change it” became the content for the decolonising programme.

Who has been involved so far?

 

This process has included more than 30 people and roughly 24 organisations working on racial and social justice issues, as well as organisations from the current digital rights field and funders. This outline draft is the product of collective work from those 30 participants, rather than DFF and EDRi. Read about the core participants [here].

Building an imaginative, iterative process

 

Rarely do social justice movements get the space to reflect, to re-imagine, to rebuild. That’s why this has been such a demanding process, we have been forced – not only to critique our movements – but also try to build otherwise. As in, in the space of a world, or a field, organised with certain power dynamics, what would we put instead? What would that look like? How to create afresh?

We need to resist toxic cultures of objectivity and perfectionism, and instead building comfort with critique, reflection, consultation, and constant iteration. We’ve tried to resist linearity in our process, understanding that our ideas need to be unpacked, unraveled, and built anew, and within that process itself comes the change we hope to see. We look forward to engaging more people in this process through the consultations and ongoing work.

As such, the following outline is an incomplete and ‘imperfect’ draft of the decolonising programme that we hope to present in full later in 2023. It’s open to changes and new additions. This outline will undergo a series of consultations with communities, individuals, collectives, organisations who were not part of the original process. We hope to critique, build, and develop on these ideas, hopefully getting closer to an ambitious, disruptive, imaginative agenda of decolonisation.

The consultations 

 

The programme is not perfect nor complete. It’s open to changes and new additions. We hope to critique, build and develop on these ideas, hopefully getting closer to an ambitious, disruptive, imaginative agenda of decolonisation.

We will be holding 1:1 conversations, inviting written feedback and a public consultation about the outline draft. In particular, we are seeking to expand our community and engage people who have not been part of the initial decolonising design process. Where we reach out to specific contributors, we offer a stipend for participation.

We see the consultation as an ongoing and iterative process and we are hoping to create space for people to continue to inform the shape and nature of the programme.

Specifically looking to what the gaps in our outline programme are, we are looking to iteratively incorporate and review the programme according to the feedback we get. We commit to giving proper attribution to people any ideas that surface in the consultation that we end up integrating into the programme, unless they would prefer to remain anonymous. 

The feedback we receive will be synthesised into a report and anonymised. We plan to share this report with the participants of the design process and make changes to the programme to integrate the insights from the community.

We will share a high level summary of this feedback report and the final version of the initial Decolonising the Digital Rights Field programme by July 2023.

Next steps: future of the process

 

Beyond the consultations, there are still many pending questions of implementation. To ground the fulfillment of the decolonising process principles and its programme, we will work toward a longer-term transition plan for how this work will be collectively implemented and owned. Our hope is that the fruits of this collective design can continue to engage more people, communities, and organisations, especially those most affected by digital discrimination, surveillance and extraction.

While EDRi and DFF have a role to play and hope to continue be a part of a wider process, we acknowledge that EDRi and DFF are not the best placed to lead this process in the long run. We know organisations that have a long tradition and extended knowledge and practices of anticolonial, antiracist, queer, transfeminist, anticapitalist organisational work would be best placed to take it further.

If you have any further comments or questions, you can write to us at laurence@digitalfreedomfund.org or sarah.chander@edri.org